Oral Presentation Australian and New Zealand Stroke Organisation Conference 2026

Benchmarking home-based stroke rehabilitation against clinical guidelines a multi-site audit with clinician interviews (138895)

Laura Jolliffe 1 2 , Stephanie Baber 2 , Stephanie Fletcher 1 , David Snowdon 2 3 , Henry Van Ginkle 4 , Emma Schneider 5 , Elizabeth Lynch 6 , Nadine Andrew 7 , Natasha Lannin 8
  1. Monash University, Frankston, VIC, Australia
  2. Peninsula Care Group, Bayside Health, Frankston, VIC, Australia
  3. La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
  4. Stroke Survivor Collaborator, Melbourne
  5. Swinburne University, Melbourne
  6. Flinders University, Adelaide, SA
  7. National Centre for Healthy Ageing, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
  8. Department of Neurosciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

Background/Aims: Home-based stroke rehabilitation, including bed-substitution services (BSS) and early supported discharge (ESD), is expanding across Australia. Unlike inpatient rehabilitation, there is no routine monitoring of guideline-recommended care in these settings. This study quantified guideline adherence in home-based services and explored referral decision-making.

Methods: An explanatory sequential mixed-methods study was conducted across three public health networks in Victoria. In Phase 1, medical records were audited against Stroke Foundation rehabilitation audit indicators. An individual-level composite adherence score was calculated as the proportion of applicable indicators met per person. Results were compared descriptively with published national inpatient data. In Phase 2, semi-structured interviews with clinicians and service leaders explored referral pathways and allocation decision-making.

Results: Across 181 episodes (BSS n=108; ESD n=73), median individual-level adherence ranged from 54–63% across sites and models. Goal setting (BSS 94%; ESD 96% vs 90% inpatient), mood assessment (95–96% vs 66%) and discharge planning (91–92% vs 83%) met or exceeded inpatient benchmarks. Gaps were identified in upper limb task-specific training (59–62% vs 84%), circuit class therapy (0–3% vs 35%) and carer training (74% BSS; 33% ESD vs 84%). Interviews (n=13) identified four considerations influencing allocation: (1) capacity of the stroke survivor–carer dyad to manage at home; (2) dyad preferences; (3) perceived fit between service capability and stroke severity; and (4) service and system factors.

Conclusions: Home-based stroke rehabilitation shows strengths in person-centred care but gaps in therapy-specific and secondary prevention indicators. Findings identify opportunities to improve referral pathways and broaden access.